Orange Coast College Apollo 13 Movie Analysis Please read the instructions carefully. The instructor is strict about following the instructions. The paper

Orange Coast College Apollo 13 Movie Analysis Please read the instructions carefully. The instructor is strict about following the instructions. The paper will be Scanned and run through TurnItIn.com. The paper should be your own work .

Apollo 13is a movie based on what was to be the third lunar-landing mission. This film shows the trials and tribulations of the Apollo 13 crew, mission control, and families after a near-fatal accident cripples the space vehicle. A mission that couldn’t get TV airtime because space flights had become routine to the American public suddenly grabbed the national spotlight. This is a tale of averted tragedy, heroism and gives important lessons on the impact and importance of teamwork, management, and communication. (To get started and before you watch the film, check out this Forbes article “Apollo 13: Lessons From A Successful Failure” -https://goo.gl/B7a1Wx)

Prompt: In the book, Good to Great in the Social Sector, Jim Collins discusses the importance of an organization determining its own definition of great (and how it will be measured) and then establishes three stages of organizations that made the jump from good to great. How did NASA initially define “great” and how did that definition change throughout the movie? What specific, varied examples from the movie showcase the various tenets of Good to Great? For this assignment you may either do one of two things:

Write a traditional 5-7 page paper or
Create a Google Slides presentation that utilizes the strategies discussed in class to “Present Like A Rockstar” and then create a screencast via Screencastify where you narrate your presentation.

Description:A film analysis is not a review or summary of the plot, it should go deeper into analysis and reaction. It should give a strong argument as to how Apollo 13 demonstrates the key tenets found in Good to Great. Provide discussion and analysis of how the movie showcases and illustrates the characteristics Jim Collins describes in his book Good to Great in the Social Sector withvaried, specific examples from the film to support arguments and viewpoints in the following areas:

Definition of Great
How did the definition of great change over the course of the film?
Level 5 Leadership
Pick a character that demonstrated Level 5 Leadership traits giving specific examples from the film to illustrate this.
Getting the Right People on the Bus (First Who, Then What)
What is a specific instance that showcased that the right people were in the right seats on the bus?
The Hedgehog Concept
Throughout the film, different characters and groups of characters worked together on what they were best at…give an example.
Turning the Flywheel.
What are some of the specific events, perhaps imperceptible at first, built the momentum that got the astronauts home?

Requirements:

Movie Critique Paper:

Title page, be typed, double spaced with a 12 pt. Font (Times New Roman or Arial).
One-inch sized margins.
Contain information detailed in the description section of these guidelines.
Scanned and run through TurnItIn.com.

Google Slides Presentation

Slides should be heavier on images than text.
One slide minimum for each of the five tenets as well as slides to give a brief synopsis of what the five tenets are and how Apollo 13 is a good example of those tenets.
Screeencast should provide the analysis utilizing the slides as visual aids (we do not need to be read to!)

Completed assignments will be collected at the start of class on March 18, 2020

Rubric:

Area

4 – Masterful

3 – Skilled

2 – Developing

1 – Novice

Focus, Purpose, Thesis (Controlling idea)

(10 pts)

Engaging and full development of a clear thesis as appropriate to assignment purpose.

Competent and well- developed thesis; thesis represents sound and adequate understanding of the assigned topic.

Mostly intelligible ideas; thesis is weak, unclear, too broad, or only indirectly supported.

Ideas are simplistic, showing signs of, misunderstanding of the prompt; thesis is essentially missing

Ideas, support, and development (evidence)

(35 pts)

Consistent evidence with originality and depth of ideas; ideas work together as a unified whole; main points are sufficiently supported

(with evidence); evidence is valid, specific,and original.

Ideas supported sufficiently; support is sound, valid, and logical. Evidence is applicable but general.

Main points and ideas are only indirectly supported; support isn’t sufficient or specific, but is loosely relevant to main points. Repetition of examples.

Lack of support for main points; frequent and illogical generalizations without support.

Structure and organization

(25 pts)

Organization is sequential and appropriate to assignment; paragraphs are well developed and appropriately divided; ideas linked with smooth and effective transitions.

Competent organization, without sophistication. Competent paragraph structure; lacking in effective transitions.

Organization, while attempted, was unsuccessful. Paragraphs were simple, disconnected and formulaic. No evident transitions or planned sequence.

Organization, if evident at all, is confusing and disjointed; paragraph structure is weak; transitions are missing, inappropriate and/or illogical.

Audience, tone, and point-of-view

(10 pts)

Clear discernment of distinctive audience; tone and point-of-view appropriate to the assignment. Avoids first and second person in analysis and discussion.

Effective and accurate awareness of general audience; tone and point-of-view satisfactory, but not perfect.

Little or inconsistent sense of audience related to assignment purpose; tone and point-of-view not refined or consistent. Frequent usage of first and/or second person.

Shows almost no awareness of a particular audience; reveals no grasp of appropriate tone and/or point-of-view for given assignment.

Sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

(10 pts)

Each sentence structured effectively, powerfully; rich, well-chosen variety of sentence styles and length.

Virtually free of punctuation, spelling, capitalization errors; appropriate format and presentation for assignment.

Effective and varied sentences; errors (if any) due to lack of careful proofreading; syntax errors (if any) reflect uses as colloquialisms.

Contains only occasional punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors. Few formatting errors. Most errors likely careless.

Formulaic or tedious sentence patterns; shows some errors in sentence construction; some non-standard syntax usage.

Contains several

(mostly common) punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization errors. Several errors in formatting or formatting is inconsistent.

Simple sentences used excessively, almost exclusively; frequent errors of sentence structure.

Contains many and serious errors of punctuation, spelling, and/or capitalization; errors severely interfere with meaning. Formatting weak.

100 points total