Yang Zhou Rich People’s Eagerness to Degree Presentation Your final paper is built up around the various components of you assembled throughout the course.

Yang Zhou Rich People’s Eagerness to Degree Presentation Your final paper is built up around the various components of you assembled throughout the course. As you’ve done a lot of work, the final version has you assembling for use. Below each section, I note where you can look back to because you’ve already begun the vast majority of these parts, now it’s assembling, expansion, and editing.

This may seem a bit odd because it’s not really a “paper” in the sense you’re used to which, yes, that’s correct. But the process here is actually the core process that is used by the majority of researchers as we begin our own studies: we have an idea, get some basic understanding of its scope, read some literature to get a handle on the state of the field and broader/deeper knowledge of the topic, and form some beginning hypotheses from this to get us grounded on what we actually know and what we want to know.

For your final paper, you will need to submit a document that contain the following sections. These should be formatted generally in APA style:

Double-spaced

Size 12 font

Times New Roman

Hanging indent/alphabetical references list

Note: you don’t need a cover page! So just have a running head that is the title like “DRINKING BEHAVIOR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS” but you won’t need a page that has “Running head: DRINKING BEHAVIOR OF COLLEGE STUDENTS.”

Page numbers on all pages!

Make sure your name is on the first page!

Simple Introduction

Your introduction should be a paragraph long. In this paragraph, I want you to present that topic you’ve been interested in, noting a research question and the logic/reasoning that you’re interested in this topic. Additionally, you must include a point drawn from either one of the data sites presented in the final week or from a trustworthy news source that gives some insight into the scale of the problem that you’re interested in. For example, if your paper is about college drinking, you’d want some sort of basic statistic that says what percent of college students drink (or, you could even fine tune it a bit further and do what percent of college students binge drink). This is so your reader/audience can understand and draw a sort of why is this an important topic. Make sure this is cohesive enough that the next section.

Basic items from earlier weeks to use as the basis here: Project Idea from Week 3

Annotated Bibliography

Rather than have you assemble a literature review that links your articles together, you will need to do an annotated bibliography of your articles. For this, you will need a total of five academic, peer-reviewed articles (note: you’ve already found 3, so you’ll just expand on them as you find two more!). For these five articles, they can address the variables you’re interested in varying amounts. So, you could have two articles about race, only one on gender, and two on age. Each of annotations need to be a fully fleshed out annotated bibliography.

The best resource on this is OWL Purdue: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/ (Links to an external site.)

Now, an important note is their annotation examples highlight a few different types: MLA, APA, and Chicago. Normally, the APA approach doesn’t include a reflection for using it in your own work (this is because the annotated bibliographies are meant to be a repository for your own use so that, if you’re writing another paper in the future and think you want to use a reference again, you can review your own notes to see if it’ll be useful). For this project, I want you to use the MLA approach: “a summary, an evaluation of the text, and a reflection on its applicability to his/her own research” (The Writing Lab, 2017). All five must have these 3 sections.

Basic items from earlier weeks to use as the basis here: Project Idea from Week 3; Finding (and Using) Relevant Literature

Hypotheses

The last items that I want you to develop in this are a set of three hypotheses built from the literature. So, you’ve already spent some time on your articles and thinking about your topic and variables over the week. You’re going to end the components of this by articulating specific hypotheses from the literature you just assembled that would guide your own research. You don’t need to go into heavy or long explanations on this but the when your reader/audience sees your hypotheses, the annotations they just read should prime them on these. Basically, do these hypotheses connect to the annotations that I just read or do they seem to come out of left field.

Basic items from earlier weeks to use as the basis here: Lecture Week 3: The Importance of Getting the Hypotheses Right

References

And, finally, a full references list that is correctly formatted. Remember, this will have six entries (your five articles and the background source from your introduction).

Above is the requirement of the paper. And the resources you might use (as you see in the content which are underscored by underline) are in the files I upload. You can check them.

Based on the paper, please help me to make a powerpoint. Do not need to decorate it, just insert words!

1. Title Slide

2. Background Slide

This should introduce the topic and present what you’re specifically interested in understanding

3. Body Slides

These slides should give some thematic focus. You will give short summaries on the slides and lecture over them, going more in-depth to guide your audience

4. Hypotheses

Since you’ve read literature to help you understand your topic better, generate key hypotheses that you’d build from this literature.

This highlights your ability to apply the literature you’ve read abstractly

5. Conclusion Slide

A summative point and idea on what you’d want to expand the literature to

6. References Slide

Full citations for all references in APA format Lecture Exercise: Hypotheses
For this assignment, you need to address the issues, ideas, and processes of hypotheses. Please
answer each question fully.
1. Why are hypotheses referred to as “educated guesses?”
Because the hypothesis provides a suggested outcome based on the evidence.
2. Before we begin any literature reviews, we regularly come to research with an idea of
“what’s going on” in mind, though this is based on personal experience. Do our initial
ideas/interests in a topic constitute a hypothesis? Why or why not?
When researchers develop the hypothesis, which could also be referred as educated guesses, they
must consider what is required to test it. The dependent variable is the one being affected. It
depends on the independent variable.
The following list are hypotheses that need to be critiqued. What you need to do is either fix
what is stated (and explain what the problem was) or state that the hypothesis is correct as is.
3. Gender influences how often one votes.
Problems: there is a vague relationship between dependent variable and independent variable.
How often? If males often vote for or female? And what is the precise frequency instead of
“often”?
Correct: the hypothesis of the study is that males take more votes than females.
4. The more money one has, the more problems in life they experience.
Correct.
5. Religion influences happiness.
Problems: the vague relation between religion (independent variable) and happiness (dependent
variable). What is the object? All people or an exact group of people? If religion cause people to
be happier or less happy?
Correct: the hypothesis of the study is that compared with people without religious belief,
religion would lead a happier mode.
6. The older one is, the less likely they are to vote Republican.
Correct.
7. Students who text during class do worse on exams than students who do not text during class.
Correct.
Finally, to practice a bit further, I’m going to give you 3 examples of two variables without
stating either as the independent or dependent variable. I want you to state a hypothesis based
upon these two variables and explain your reasoning behind it. (This is meant to get you in the
habit of seeing how you must give legitimate justifications for your hypotheses.)
8. Gender and Religiosity
Based on the previous knowledge, we could scrupulously hypothesize that the majority religious
votaries are males; the small group of religiosity is constituted by females.
9. Political Party and Gun Ownership
Based on the previous knowledge, we could carefully hypothesize that compared with political
party without gun ownership, the one with the support of gun owner earns more votes.
10. Household income and Happiness
Based on the previous knowledge, we could hypothesize that the household who earns more
income would be happier.
Yang Zhou
Rich People’s Eagerness to Degree
Dependent Variable: requirements of higher even highest degree.
Independent Variable:
social status
wealth condition
family background.
Compared with poor people, wealthy people are more likely to receive the higher
education to get the qualification. They need the corresponding educational
background to support their real identity. My topic is concentrated on the reasons that
contribute to why rich people are eager to high academic education.
Therefore, I want to prove that the wealthier people want to ask for a higher
educational degree for their higher social status. And people own more money are
more likely to get higher academic certification. At last, rich people need to be
qualified and outstanding in an exact area because of the strong family background.
1. Higher education institutions have a dual role with regard to widening
participation: to help those from under-represented groups by countering the
effects of socio-economic and educational disadvantage, and to provide a learning
environment that enables them to realize their potential.
2. This groundbreaking book offers educators a clear understanding of the concept of
social justice and includes effective practices to help them promote social justice
and address identity development on their campuses.
3. This paper analyzes the impact of family background, using paternal occupation
and education as indicators, on their scores in the National College Entrance
Examination, the level and type of higher education institutions they attend, their
employment after graduation, and the income they receive from their first job.
Reference
Lindström, J. (2006). Can only Rich People Study? Youth, Segregated Suburbs and
Higher Education: experience from Sweden. Widening Participation and Lifelong
Learning, 8(2), 6–13.
Davis, T., & Harrison, L. (2013). Advancing social justice tools, pedagogies, and
strategies to transform your campus. Hoboken: Wiley.
Wen, D. (2006). Impacts of social economic status on higher education opportunity
and graduate employment in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(3), 426–438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-006-0019-y
Lecture Exercise: Hypotheses
For this assignment, you need to address the issues, ideas, and processes of hypotheses. Please
answer each question fully.
1. Why are hypotheses referred to as “educated guesses?”
Because the hypothesis provides a suggested outcome based on the evidence.
2. Before we begin any literature reviews, we regularly come to research with an idea of
“what’s going on” in mind, though this is based on personal experience. Do our initial
ideas/interests in a topic constitute a hypothesis? Why or why not?
When researchers develop the hypothesis, which could also be referred as educated guesses, they
must consider what is required to test it. The dependent variable is the one being affected. It
depends on the independent variable.
The following list are hypotheses that need to be critiqued. What you need to do is either fix
what is stated (and explain what the problem was) or state that the hypothesis is correct as is.
3. Gender influences how often one votes.
Problems: there is a vague relationship between dependent variable and independent variable.
How often? If males often vote for or female? And what is the precise frequency instead of
“often”?
Correct: the hypothesis of the study is that males take more votes than females.
4. The more money one has, the more problems in life they experience.
Correct.
5. Religion influences happiness.
Problems: the vague relation between religion (independent variable) and happiness (dependent
variable). What is the object? All people or an exact group of people? If religion cause people to
be happier or less happy?
Correct: the hypothesis of the study is that compared with people without religious belief,
religion would lead a happier mode.
6. The older one is, the less likely they are to vote Republican.
Correct.
7. Students who text during class do worse on exams than students who do not text during class.
Correct.
Finally, to practice a bit further, I’m going to give you 3 examples of two variables without
stating either as the independent or dependent variable. I want you to state a hypothesis based
upon these two variables and explain your reasoning behind it. (This is meant to get you in the
habit of seeing how you must give legitimate justifications for your hypotheses.)
8. Gender and Religiosity
Based on the previous knowledge, we could scrupulously hypothesize that the majority religious
votaries are males; the small group of religiosity is constituted by females.
9. Political Party and Gun Ownership
Based on the previous knowledge, we could carefully hypothesize that compared with political
party without gun ownership, the one with the support of gun owner earns more votes.
10. Household income and Happiness
Based on the previous knowledge, we could hypothesize that the household who earns more
income would be happier.
Yang Zhou
Rich People’s Eagerness to Degree
Dependent Variable: requirements of higher even highest degree.
Independent Variable:
social status
wealth condition
family background.
Compared with poor people, wealthy people are more likely to receive the higher
education to get the qualification. They need the corresponding educational
background to support their real identity. My topic is concentrated on the reasons that
contribute to why rich people are eager to high academic education.
Therefore, I want to prove that the wealthier people want to ask for a higher
educational degree for their higher social status. And people own more money are
more likely to get higher academic certification. At last, rich people need to be
qualified and outstanding in an exact area because of the strong family background.
1. Higher education institutions have a dual role with regard to widening
participation: to help those from under-represented groups by countering the
effects of socio-economic and educational disadvantage, and to provide a learning
environment that enables them to realize their potential.
2. This groundbreaking book offers educators a clear understanding of the concept of
social justice and includes effective practices to help them promote social justice
and address identity development on their campuses.
3. This paper analyzes the impact of family background, using paternal occupation
and education as indicators, on their scores in the National College Entrance
Examination, the level and type of higher education institutions they attend, their
employment after graduation, and the income they receive from their first job.
Reference
Lindström, J. (2006). Can only Rich People Study? Youth, Segregated Suburbs and
Higher Education: experience from Sweden. Widening Participation and Lifelong
Learning, 8(2), 6–13.
Davis, T., & Harrison, L. (2013). Advancing social justice tools, pedagogies, and
strategies to transform your campus. Hoboken: Wiley.
Wen, D. (2006). Impacts of social economic status on higher education opportunity
and graduate employment in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(3), 426–438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-006-0019-y

Purchase answer to see full
attachment