ITS 360 CSU Module 8 Digital Crime or Cyber Crimes Portfolio Project You are the information technology senior analyst at your company. Your company can be
ITS 360 CSU Module 8 Digital Crime or Cyber Crimes Portfolio Project You are the information technology senior analyst at your company. Your company can be a real business where you work or a virtual business that you would like to start. In both cases, you should be familiar with the business environment and the nature of work performed at your selected company. If you need help with selecting an appropriate company, please contact your instructor. Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both
assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
Option #1: Information Technology Analysis
You are the information technology senior analyst at your company. Your company can
be a real business where you work or a virtual business that you would like to start. In
both cases, you should be familiar with the business environment and the nature of
work performed at your selected company. If you need help with selecting an
appropriate company, please contact your instructor.
Your CEO meets with you and assigns you the following tasks, which you will assemble
in a written report to the CEO:
Review the company’s infrastructure and identify of all types of vulnerabilities:
environmental, physical, and human.
Suggest and discuss security models that can be used to overcome the
associated security risks.
Design a robust security plan for the company.
Design a code of ethics related to the IT profession that can be applied at the
company.
Portfolio Milestones:
You will complete and receive points for two Portfolio Milestones that will help you
complete your project. This work will inform your final project, but you will not re-submit
this work with your final project. Here are the milestones:
Module 2: Describe the company you will be analyzing for the project. Include size,
industry, and location. (25 Points)
Module 6: Provide an outline of the security models you will be presenting in your
portfolio project. (25 Points)
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Paper length: 8-10 pages
Include at least five scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The
CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Format according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Option #2: Digital Crime
In the broadest sense, a digital crime is any illegal activity that uses a computer during
its commission. Computer crime encompasses a wide range of activities from fraud and
financial crimes, cyber terrorism, cyber extortion, to even cyber warfare. Conduct
research on 5 different types of digital crime and real-world examples of each. For each
real-world example:
Describe the crime that was committed.
How was a computer used in the crime?
Who were the victim(s) of the crime?
What was the effect or outcome of the criminal act (on the system/victim)?
How could the crime have been prevented?
Were the perpetrators identified or caught?
Was any action taken against the perpetrators, and if so, what?
Portfolio Milestones:
You will complete and receive points for two Portfolio Milestones that will help you
complete your project. This work will inform your final project, but you will not re-submit
this work with your final project.
Module 2: Provide an outline of the 5 types of cybercrime you will research. (25 Points)
Module 6: Provide the 5 real-world cases you will analyze for the portfolio project. (25
points)
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Paper length: 8-10 pages
Include at least five scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The
CSU Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Format according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Rubric
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeRequirements
Ratings
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
The Portfolio
includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
The Portfolio
includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
The Portfolio
includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Pts
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
The Portfolio
includes few of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
20.0 pts
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeContent
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or
adequate knowledge of
company infrastructure,
general infrastructure
vulnerabilities, security
models, security plans,
and IT codes of ethics;
and/or how this
knowledge relates to
security breaches;
correctly represents
knowledge from the
readings and sources.
24.0 to
>21.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
21.0 to
>14.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration
of knowledge.
14.0 to
>0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of
the materials.
30.0 pts
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeIdentification
of Vulnerabilities
35.0 to >28.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and analysis in
identification of
vulnerabilities that
inform a security plan
or that were used to
breach security.
28.0 to >21.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis.
21.0 to
>14.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
14.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
21.0 to
>14.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
14.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought,
insight, and
analysis.
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeSecurity
Models
35.0 to >28.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and analysis in
discussion of security
models that can be used
to overcome the
associated security risks
or to prevent security
breaches and/or digital
crime.
28.0 to >21.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis.
35.0 pts
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeSecurity Plan
60.0 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or
adequate synthesis of
course concepts in
development and design of
security plan or in the
critique of an existing
security plan that was
breached.
48.0 to
>36.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
errors or
omissions in
synthesis.
36.0 to
>24.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors
or omissions
in synthesis.
24.0 to
>0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis.
35.0 to >28.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or
adequate synthesis of
course concepts in
development and design of
IT code of ethics or the
analysis and/or critique of
actions that were taken
against perpetrators of
digital crime.
28.0 to
>21.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some
significant but
not major errors
or omissions in
synthesis.
21.0 to
>14.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors
or omissions
in synthesis.
14.0 to
>0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis.
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeIT Code of
Ethics
35.0 pts
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeSources
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeApplication
of Source Material
Ratings
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Cites and
integrates at least
five credible
sources.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Cites and
integrates four
credible sources.
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the
issue; knowledge from
the course linked
properly to source
material.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
problems with
selection and
linkage of
sources.
Pts
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Cites and
integrates three
credible sources.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major
problems with
selection and
linkage of
sources.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Cites and
integrates two or
fewer credible
sources.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Source
selection is
seriously
flawed; no
linkage to
knowledge
from the
course.
15.0 pts
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper essay
format, including
an introduction,
body, and
conclusion.
Conforms to
project
requirements.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Small number of
significant but not
major flaws in
organization and
writing; is in
proper essay
format. In a minor
way does not
conform to project
requirements.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major problems in
organization and
writing; does not
completely follow
proper essay
format. In a
significant way
does not conform
to project
requirements.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Project is not
well organized
or well written
and is not in
proper essay
format. Does not
conform to
project
requirements.
20.0 pts
ITS360 Mod 8 PP (1)
Criteria
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeGrammar and
Style
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeDemonstrates
proper use of APA
style
Total Points: 300.0
Previous
Ratings
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure; few or
no minor errors in
grammar and
spelling;
appropriate writing
style; clear and
concise with no
unsupported
comments.
16.0 to
>12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Small number
of significant
but not major
errors in
grammar and
spelling;
generally
appropriate
writing.
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Project contains
proper APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU Global
Writing Center,
with no more than
one significant
error.
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Few errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU Global
Writing Center,
with no more than
two to three
significant errors.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development;
work needed on
grammar and
spelling; does not
meet program
expectations.
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Significant errors
in APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU Global
Writing Center,
with four to five
significant errors.
Pts
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Poor quality;
unacceptable in
terms of
grammar and/or
spelling;
inappropriate
writing style that
interferes with
clarity.
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Numerous errors
in APA
formatting,
according to the
CSU Global
Writing Center,
with more than
five significant
errors.
20.0 pts
15.0 pts
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
