Coleiidae Van Straelen Case Study Summary Please read the instructions attached below as well as the as article and write a summary must be NO longer than

Coleiidae Van Straelen Case Study Summary Please read the instructions attached below as well as the as article and write a summary must be NO longer than one page. GUIDELINES FOR WRITING PAPER SUMMARY FOR BIO 101
You must turn in a copy of the entire article you are summarizing, either via email (preferably) or as a
printout. Your summary may be emailed or turned in as a hard copy. All emailed materials must be
received at or before the beginning of class on the due date.
Writing the summary:
• The summary should be typed. It must be no longer than one page. There should be no cover
sheet.
• You must summarize each of the sections (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) of the
primary article.
• I do not expect you to understand every detail in the paper, but you must be able to understand
the general principles and research involved. If you don’t understand anything in the paper, then
choose another one to summarize.
• You must use your own words. Do not simply take sentences directly from the paper and put
them in your summary.
• Scientific names must be italicized or underlined. The genus should be capitalized, the species
should not be capitalized. ex: Thalassia testudinum.
• There should be no spelling, grammatical, and typographical errors.
Name: __________________________________________________________________
Grading Criteria for Summary of Scientific Paper
Demonstration of scientific
literacy
Points
Awarded:_____
Demonstration and
documentation of scientific
observations
Points Awarded:_____
Application of the steps in the
scientific method
Points Awarded:_____
Demonstration of analytical
thought through clear conclusions
Points Awarded:_____
Demonstration of written
communication skills; spelling,
grammar, and format
Points
Awarded:_____
Points = 5
Points = 4
Points = 3
Points = 2
Points = 1
The summary
makes it very
clear that the
student
understands the
purpose of the
paper.
There is
evidence that
the student
clearly
understands the
concept of the
paper and the
significance of
the data
provided.
The summary
makes it
sufficiently clear
that the student
understands the
purpose of the
paper.
There is
evidence that
the student
adequately
understands the
concept of the
paper and the
significance of
the data
provided.
The summary
makes it
somewhat clear
that the student
understands the
purpose of the
paper.
There is
evidence that
the student
doesn’t fully
understand
some concepts
of the paper and
the significance
of the data
provided.
The summary
does not make it
clear that the
student
understands the
purpose of the
paper.
There is
evidence that the
student has
minimal
understanding of
the concepts of
the paper and
the significance
of the data
provided.
The summary of
the paper is
vague. There is
evidence that the
student has no
understanding of
the significance
of the information
provided in the
scientific paper.
Scientific facts
and
observations
are present in
the summary,
and are relevant
and correct as
stated.
Scientific facts
and
observations
are present in
the summary,
and mostly
relevant and
correct.
Scientific facts
and
observations are
present in the
summary, but
several are
irrelevant or
incorrectly
stated.
Very few
scientific facts or
observations are
present or
correctly stated
in the summary.
No relevant
scientific facts or
observations are
present or
correctly stated
in the summary.
Steps of the
scientific
method used in
the paper are
defined explicitly
in the summary
using
appropriate
scientific terms.
All issues are
addressed
thoroughly.
Steps of the
scientific
method used in
the paper are
defined
adequately in
the summary.
Some issues
are not
addressed
thoroughly.
Steps of the
scientific
method used in
the paper are
defined
satisfactorily in
the summary.
Several issues
are not
addressed
thoroughly.
Steps of the
scientific method
used in the paper
are not well
defined in the
summary. Most
issues are not
addressed
thoroughly.
Steps of the
scientific method
used in the paper
are not defined in
the summary.
Concepts are
clearly stated
and expressed
thoroughly in
the summary;
analysis is
logical and
complete.
Concepts are
stated and
expressed
adequately in
the summary;
analysis is
mostly logical
and complete.
Concepts are
stated but not
expressed
thoroughly in the
summary;
analysis is
logical but
incomplete.
Concepts are not
stated or are
unclear in the
summary;
analysis is
absent.
Writing is
excellent, word
usage, spelling,
grammar and
punctuation is
excellent.
Formatting is as
instructed.
Writing is
adequate
sufficient use of
wording,
grammar and
punctuation,
very few errors.
Formatting is as
instructed.
Writing is
satisfactory,
average use of
wording,
grammar and
punctuation,
several errors;
Formatting
mostly as
instructed.
Concepts are
minimally stated
and not
expressed
thoroughly in the
summary;
analysis is not
logical and is
incomplete.
Writing is below
average,
insufficient use of
wording,
grammar and
punctuation,
many errors.
Formatting is
mostly not as
instructed.
Writing is poor,
too many
deficiencies in
word use,
grammar,
punctuation and
presentation.
Formatting is not
as instructed.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment