HA415 Aspen University Healthcare Policy and Economics Questions Assignment: Explain the flow of funds within an organization including private pay and th
HA415 Aspen University Healthcare Policy and Economics Questions Assignment:
Explain the flow of funds within an organization including private pay and third party reimbursement.
Assignment Description: This assignment will be at least 1000 words or more
This week you will reflect upon accountability in healthcare to answer the following questions:
How can you prevent abuses and inefficiencies in third party payments?
Briefly define the flow of funds in the Care Organization.
What challenges do consumers face who are enrolled in private insurance?
What methods can you use to empower the consumer?
Assignment Expectations: How will students be successful?
Length:
1000-1250 words (4-5 pages); answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner
Structure:
Include a title page and reference page in APA style
References:
Two scholarly references are required; you should include the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions
Format:
Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx), Open Office (.odt) or rich text format (.rtf) file type
File name:
Name your saved file according to your last name, first initial and the week (for example, jonesb.week1)
Submission:
Submit your assignment to the Drop Box Date
Sep 16, 2019 11:00 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Undergrad Simple Essay Rubric v1
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and
includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%
Approaches 60%
Meets 70%
Exceeds 100%
Content Weight: 30%
0 points
Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to
understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection
to the assignment topic.
18 points
Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate
understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the
assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few
details and/or examples are given.
21 points
Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is
evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description,
with adequate attention to detail.
30 points
In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in
information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using
clear and focused details.
/ 30
Organization Weight: 25%
0 points
Organization is confusing and interferes with readers ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of
topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or
irrelevant.
15 points
Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear
organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion
contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new
information.
17.5 points
Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient
introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with
credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.
25 points
Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas;
Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent
concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.
/ 25
Logic/Argument Weight: 15%
0 points
Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are
weak or illogical.
9 points
Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.
10.5 points
Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.
15 points
Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.
/ 15
Support Weight: 20%
0 points
Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality
or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.
APA format and style are not evident.
12 points
Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant
or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA
elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.
14 points
Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum
number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are
present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.
20 points
Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the
minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are
presented. No APA errors are evident.
/ 20
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%
0 points
Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively
redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
6 points
Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often
unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
7 points
Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and
purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present,
but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are used.
10 points
Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality
and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and
typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is
clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
/ 10
Rubric Total Score
Total
/ 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
Level 10 points minimum
Level 260 points minimum
Level 370 points minimum
Level 4100 points minimum
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
