Im studying for my Law class and need an explanation.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Constitutional Criminal Procedure and Due Process | Homework Writings Help
Just from $13/Page
There are several amendments to the Constitution that help ensure due process for defendants.
For this assignment, review the attached case found in Chapter 2 of your Samaha textbook:
U.S. v. Thorpe (2006)
Using specific examples, critically analyze if due process was provided in your the case. Ensure you relate your analysis to the specific amendments that provide due process rights. Do you agree with the courts ruling the case? Why or why not?
- 3 4 pages in length (not including title or reference pages), double spaced, and include a minimum of two, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles from the CSU-Global Library.
- Format your document according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.), including in-text citations and properly formatted references.
Rubric
CRJ420 Mod 1 CT
CRJ420 Mod 1 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the *Constitutional Criminal Procedure and Due Process* assignment.
|
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
10.0 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
5.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
| 25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given regarding Due Process.
|
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
|
| 25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in issues related to Due Process procedures.
|
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCRJ4201 – Discuss the history and purpose of the United States Constitution as it relates to criminal defendants
Discuss the history and purpose of the United States Constitution as it relates to criminal defendants
|
| 5.0 pts
Meets Expectation- Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of theory; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation – Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
2.0 pts
Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
0.0 pts
Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 110.0
|
